Oh no. Not a tough vote. Everyone needs to stop being such a fucking chickenshit. I don’t give a shit about the republicans bitching about process or democrats having to go on record.
Fuck off with this. A young Gen-Xer is basically millennial anyway. Damn, I'm getting roasted from all angles.
This law is among the many California computer crimes. It is a misdemeanor offense, where people convicted for their first offense can be sentenced to up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. If the victim was a minor, however, the penalty can be increased to one year in jail and a fine of up to $2,000. He can share a cell with Nebraska football player Mo Washington. Hope each photo counts as one count and he serves a long time.
If lived without shame, or had a catch and kill deal, she’d be able to withstand this. Sometimes ya just gotta be more Trumpy.
For reference - that shot is a block away from Trump Tower. They’re marching into the Loop. Not just sticking by the building.
Russia, China & India to set up alternative to SWIFT payment system to connect 3 billion people Russia rt.com/busine...
church and state whateves Christian pastor claims Democrats "have Demons in them" and are trying to "place hexes" on Trump newsweek.com/christ...
US deploying more troops around Syria oil fields after killing of Isis leader theguardian.com/us-new...
ooh the ol' "seriously but not literally" argument nate is about 15 minutes away from telling us his plan to make america great again
Officials cringe as Trump spills sensitive details of al-Baghdadi raid Some details the president has revealed are inaccurate, others are classified. Officials say they worry what to put in briefings for a man with no filter. President Donald Trump makes a statement in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House on Oct. 27, 2019.Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images Spoiler Oct. 28, 2019, 4:03 PM CDT By Courtney Kube and Carol E. Lee IRBIL, Iraq — President Donald Trump painted a vivid picture for the world of the deadly U.S. military raid on ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a raid that only a very small number of people witnessed in real time. A "beautiful" and "talented" dog got injured. A robot had been on standby to aid in the hunt for al-Baghdadi if needed. U.S. Special Operations Forces arrived in eight helicopters and were on the ground for about two hours. They entered al-Baghdadi's compound within seconds by blowing holes in the side of the wall. They chased al-Baghdadi into a web of underground tunnels — many of them dead ends — that they already knew existed. Before the U.S. forces left for the 70-minute, "very low and very, very fast" helicopter ride back along the same route from which they arrived, they captured some of al-Baghdadi's henchmen and seized "highly sensitive material and information" outlining the origin of ISIS and plans for future plots. A few of the those colorful details were wrong. Many of the rest were either highly classified or tactically sensitive, and their disclosure by the president made intelligence and military officials cringe, according to current and former U.S. officials. The al-Baghdadi raid is the most high-profile exhibit of a reality U.S. officials have had to contend with since Trump took office: a president with a background in show business who relishes delivering a compelling narrative and deals daily with the kind of covert, life-and-death sets of facts that inspire movie scripts. Who is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi? Oct. 28, 201902:25 The president, as the ultimate authority on classification, can declassify any piece of government information simply by releasing it publicly. And some top U.S. officials — including former President Barack Obama, who signed a law to reduce the amount of classified material — have lamented the government's tendency to over-classify information. But current and former senior U.S. officials said from the earliest days of his presidency that Trump consistently wants to make public more than his advisers think is legally sound or wise for U.S national security. "We agonized over what we would put in his briefings," one former senior White House official said, "because who knows if and when he's going to say something about it." "He has no filter," the official added. "But also if he knows something, and he thinks it's going to be good to say or make him appear smarter or stronger, he'll just blurt it out." On Monday, Trump declassified a photo of the dog, revealing its breed, which was classified. But the dog’s name remains top secret. Inquiries about the dog flooded in after Trump disclosed that "the K-9 was hurt, went into the tunnel." Trump also said Monday that he is considering releasing footage of the al-Baghdadi raid, and Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that the military is working on declassifying some images. "We have video and photos," Milley said. A couple of the president's statements on Sunday were inaccurate or left U.S. officials wondering where he got his information, officials said. The president said when U.S. officials notified Russia it would be entering airspace in western Syria, they told the Russians, "We think you're going to be very happy." But that phrase was not said on the call with the Russians, a U.S. official said. Trump also said al-Baghdadi was "crying and screaming" as U.S. forces chased him down, but U.S. officials said they didn't hear those sounds, and Milley told reporters he doesn't know the source of the president's information on that. The overarching concern about Trump's disclosures on the al-Baghdadi raid, officials said, is that he gave America's enemies details that could make intelligence gathering and similar military operations more difficult and more dangerous to pull off. Revealing that the U.S. possesses documents about future ISIS plans hurts the military's ability to use that information for quick follow-on operations, officials said. The president's disclosure that the U.S. had taken ISIS fighters from the compound complicated efforts to try to keep ISIS from knowing who is alive or dead for as long as possible while they interrogate them, officials said. Recommended U.S. newsHead chef of Cipriani in New York, Andrea Zamperoni, found dead nightly-newsWitness speaks out after American charged with manslaughter in Anguilla Some of the president's comments could complicate the intelligence gathering that leads to such raids because they revealed sources and methods the U.S. uses, officials said. They pointed to his saying that the U.S. knew of al-Baghdadi's whereabouts via technology, also knew and of the underground tunnels at his compound, which suggests the U.S. has infrared capabilities to locate caves and tunnels. "We knew it had tunnels. The tunnels were a dead-end, for the most part. There was one, we think, that wasn't. But we had that covered too, just in case," Trump said. Other information Trump discussed provided America's enemies with tactical details on how the military carries out a raid like the one on al-Baghdadi, officials said, including the robot, the helicopter flight patterns and how U.S. forces entered the compound. Drone video shows the devastated compound where al-Baghdadi died Oct. 28, 201900:46 Some of the information, while not overly damaging, is just more than the military would like disclosed, officials said, such as that al-Baghdadi "had a lot of cash" and the president saying he was able to view the raid remotely "as though you were watching a movie." Officials said the first major battle over disclosing details of military operations was in 2017 when Trump ordered air strikes on areas controlled by the Assad regime in Syria. The arguments against disclosures are usually based on concerns about revealing sources and methods or the idea that the more the president releases publicly, the weaker his argument about exerting executive privilege becomes. Sometimes he overrules them, while other times he simply says things publicly that they weren't expecting him to disclose. Trump has since pushed the boundaries on a myriad of topics, officials said, and they don't expect that to be curtailed. He's talked publicly about deploying a nuclear submarine in Asia, and more recently about nuclear weapons the U.S. never acknowledges it keeps in Turkey. Early in his presidency, Trump's disclosure of specific intelligence to Russian officials raised alarms among administration officials. After Trump wrote on Twitter in August that the U.S. was learning a lot about a mysterious explosion in Russia, a senior administration official told NBC News an aide would have to inform him his disclosure risked revealing sources and methods. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Truly. What was his reason for even doing this? He's talking one minute about being between addresses so he doesn't have his registration and then suddenly starts rolling up his window. Fucking weirdo.
TMB bros: Boomers ruined everything! I agreed to take on high amounts of student debt, I now demand that it be dissolved! I can’t find a job in the middle of the strongest job market ever that pays me enough or provides acceptable health care insurance, I demand universal income and free health insurance! TMB Gen Xer: I take responsibility for my circumstances and decisions. I took on high amounts of student debt and personal debt, and I worked multiple jobs to pay off every cent. I graduated into the teeth of a GOP recession and made a modest salary for a long time, and still managed to build savings. My employer sponsored health was not perfect but it saved my life several times and I’m grateful for it. TMB Bros: Stop whining Boomer bitch!
You can literally remove him and don’t have to deal with his BS. Outside of re-election, you don’t have to fear him as a non-POTUS
The chat was saying he had warrants so when they asked him to step out he rolled up his windows and prayed to Jesus Donald Trump
If you didn’t already want to beat both Zuck and Big Boy Ben to death with a shovel, this thread will do the trick. so so glad I deleted IG and never did FB
Once again the GOP demands C and once Dems give it to then they change thier argument and cry about something else
While this is true. Is there a downside to doing this? It takes away a legal argument for them. Perhaps one they never had. I don’t expect the GOP to start cooperating but this seems harmless from the dem side.
Give the republicans any power and participation is a downside. Their complaints are nonsense and completely devoid of reason. Giving them or the president and any power into an investigation in themselves is a hindrance
again, i dont disagree. I just don’t think it’s a big deal , unless there’s something I’m not considering.