So their plan is to get less people to purchase government subsidized health insurance, use that money to cut taxes, and then force everyone to pay higher health insurance premiums due to losing 15 million customers from the insurance market. Lol. That's Republicanism in a nutshell. Cut my taxes by $200, but cause my insurance premiums to go up by $300, and then tell me "Look how great we are, we cut your taxes." All the while, redistributing money out of the pockets of everyday Americans in order to funnel it to corporations (in this case, insurance companies).
Of course. Just sayin, outside of natives/residents I’ve spent more time out there than 95% of people on this board. I bring context to my comments, not just wiki knowledge. Some assume that OR, WA, even CA are some sort of liberal paradise, it’s just not true outside of specific areas.
I don’t think that anyone is saying that it wasn’t happening. However, there are people that have stated that there is an increase / expect more radicalization based on his hate rhetoric. There is some nuance there that you’re missing
Groundbreaking revelation you’ve got there. I think we can confirm that Trump did not in fact invent terrorism.
my point is they were radicalized before. they will be radicalized now. they are a group of people that are marginalized to the point of constant radicalization. one can argue that it is less about religion, and more about socio-economic factors that drive this extremist behavior. i will cede that point, but unfortunately, the common theme with all muslim terrorism is that they are muslim. trump sticks out because he offers a solution. it will lead to more radicalization, but muslims have proven to be susceptible to radicalization no matter the cause. so if they are going to be radicalized, why not focus on a solution?
Maybe this is understandable. A room is 80 degrees, someone comes along and places a second heater in the room and sets it to high. The first heater was running at medium-high, will the room get hotter?
What in this nonsense points back to my statement regarding destroying their sovereign nation states? If we hadn’t started wars with them we probably wouldn’t be at war with them. If we wouldn’t ostracize them in America external forces would be less likely to successfully radicalize
Why do you think you are universally shit on for being a moron? Is it that EVERYONE else is a moron or just you? Which do you think is more likely? Everyone or you?
well yeah. there is a level of groupthink in this thread. trump is so bad, that everything he does must be bad...anyone offering a different POV is universally shit on.
If you think Dome has ever taken the time to talk to a brown person and maybe get some of their side and take it into consideration, you got another thing coming.
Everything he does is bad...that goes hand in hand with being a moronic asshole of biblical proportions. He can’t even successfully greet trick or treaters for a photo op.
Not all but maybe this one guy had his hate fueled by trump? That tweet didn’t imply all Muslim terrorist attacks are caused by trump like you implied.
there is a dichotomy between a solution to the problem of muslim terrorism, and the solution causing more problems. what is the correct answer here? all of you agree there is a problem, but none of you are offering a solution?
Trump's rhetoric exacerbates an existing problem. OH YOU'RE SAYING TRUMP INVENTED MUSLIM TERRORISM!!!!!!
His solution being ban everyone who looks brown and comes from Muslimy countries. How the fuck can anyone actually think that’s a helpful solution
you cannot fix the problem of muslim extremism, you are correct. but you can limit those that come to your country...
His rhetoric doesn't exacerbate shit. Crazies are gonna crazy. Just because someone says something that hurts your feelings doesn't give you the right to go shoot people or run them over.